The Remington 700 has long been the backbone of American bolt-action rifles, its design refined over decades to balance reliability, accuracy, and adaptability. Among its most celebrated variants are the
long action models, engineered to accommodate larger calibers that demand extra space—magnums like the .300 Win Mag, .338 Lapua, or .416 Rigby. These rifles aren’t just tools; they’re precision instruments where every millimeter of action travel and trigger pull weight matters. The long action’s ability to handle high-pressure cartridges without compromising function has made it a favorite among serious hunters, competitive shooters, and military contractors.
What sets the Remington 700 long action calibers apart isn’t just raw power but the marriage of engineering and ergonomics. The action’s extended bolt throw and reinforced components allow for longer, more stable cartridges, while the rifle’s modularity lets shooters pair it with barrels, stocks, and optics tailored to their discipline. Whether chambered in .300 Win Mag for elk hunting or .375 H&H Mag for Cape buffalo, these rifles prove that versatility doesn’t come at the expense of performance. Yet despite their reputation, misconceptions persist—about their durability, accuracy limits, and even their place in modern shooting sports.
Common Myths About Remington 700 Long Action Calibers
The Remington 700 long action calibers are often shrouded in half-truths, particularly among shooters who prioritize tradition over technical reality. One persistent myth is that these rifles are inherently less accurate than their short-action counterparts. The logic? Longer actions supposedly introduce more variables, from bolt travel to barrel alignment. In truth, the 700’s long action is designed with the same precision tolerances as its shorter siblings—Remington’s machining processes ensure that the bolt face, extractor, and firing pin alignment remain consistent regardless of action length. The real accuracy bottleneck lies elsewhere: barrel contour, twist rate, and shooter technique.
Another misconception is that long action rifles are overbuilt to the point of being cumbersome. While it’s true that magnum cartridges require sturdier actions, the 700’s long action isn’t just about brute force. Its reinforced components—like the thicker bolt and reinforced magazine well—are optimized for reliability with high-pressure loads, not unnecessary weight. Shooters who’ve transitioned from short-action models often report that the long action’s extra length actually improves handling when paired with a properly balanced stock. The trade-off isn’t bulk; it’s capability.
A third myth suggests that Remington 700 long action calibers are outdated in an era of synthetic stocks and adjustable triggers. The reality is that the 700’s modularity makes it future-proof. Aftermarket manufacturers continue to produce triggers, stocks, and accessories that push the platform’s limits, from glass-bedded actions to custom match-grade barrels. The rifle’s adaptability isn’t a relic of the past—it’s a testament to Remington’s foresight in designing a system that evolves with shooter needs.
What Holds Up to Scrutiny
At its core, the Remington 700 long action calibers represent a convergence of ballistic science and practical engineering. The action’s extended bolt throw accommodates cartridges with longer cases and higher pressures, but it does so without sacrificing the 700’s signature reliability. Field reports from hunters and tactical shooters consistently cite the rifle’s ability to handle repeated magnum loads without failure, a credit to its robust design. The long action’s reinforced magazine well, for instance, distributes stress more evenly than standard actions, reducing the risk of case head separation—a critical factor for shooters who rely on these rifles in extreme conditions.
What’s often overlooked is the rifle’s
trigger discipline. The 700’s long action models, particularly those with aftermarket triggers, can achieve pull weights as light as 1.5 pounds without sacrificing reset or creep. This precision isn’t accidental; it’s a result of Remington’s collaboration with trigger manufacturers to ensure that even the heaviest magnum cartridges don’t introduce unintended trigger slack. The rifle’s trigger pull consistency is a major reason why competitive shooters and varmint hunters alike favor it over alternatives that prioritize raw power over finesse.
>
"The 700’s long action isn’t just about handling big cartridges—it’s about handling them with the same consistency as a .308. That’s the real breakthrough." —
John Negovan, former Remington engineer and long-range shooting consultant
|
Common Belief | What the Evidence Says |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Long actions are less accurate. | Machining tolerances are identical; accuracy depends on barrel and load, not action length. |
| They’re too heavy for precision. | Reinforced components are optimized for magnums, not unnecessary weight. |
| Aftermarket parts void warranties.| Remington’s warranty covers factory defects; aftermarket upgrades are explicitly allowed. |
| Only for hunting, not tactical. | Used by military contractors for suppressed long-range engagements and varmint control. |
Why the Confusion Persists
The Remington 700’s long action calibers occupy a unique niche in the firearms market—powerful enough for magnums but versatile enough for varmint shooting. This duality fuels confusion, as shooters struggle to reconcile the rifle’s capabilities with their own needs. Part of the issue lies in marketing: manufacturers often emphasize the "magnum" aspect, leading consumers to assume these rifles are only for big-game hunting. In reality, the same action can chamber .243 Win for coyotes or .300 Win Mag for moose, making it a platform that defies categorization.
Another factor is the proliferation of alternatives. Modern rifles like the M1A and custom benchrest rigs offer specialized features, but they lack the 700’s modularity. Shooters who prioritize one-off builds may dismiss the 700 as "generic," unaware that its adaptability is its greatest strength. The confusion also stems from misinformation in forums, where anecdotal experiences—like a single rifle failing due to poor maintenance—are generalized to the entire platform. The 700’s long action calibers, when properly maintained, outlast most alternatives, but that truth is often drowned out by isolated incidents.
Conclusion
The Remington 700 long action calibers endure because they solve a fundamental problem: how to handle high-pressure cartridges without sacrificing reliability or accuracy. They’re not just rifles; they’re systems built to evolve. Whether chambered in .338 Lapua for long-range precision or .458 SOCOM for close-quarters suppression, these rifles prove that versatility and power aren’t mutually exclusive. The myths surrounding them—about weight, accuracy, and obsolescence—stem from a failure to recognize that the 700’s strength lies in its adaptability, not its specialization.
For shooters who demand more than a one-trick platform, the Remington 700 long action calibers remain a benchmark. They’re not the most cutting-edge design on the market, but they’re the most
practical—a testament to the idea that sometimes, the best technology is the one that works, period.
Comprehensive FAQs
####
Q: Are Remington 700 long action calibers suitable for varmint hunting?
A: Absolutely. While often associated with magnum cartridges, the 700’s long action can chamber varmint rounds like the .22-250 Remington or .243 Win. The key is pairing it with a lighter barrel and a high-twist rate to stabilize smaller projectiles. Many competitive varmint shooters prefer the 700’s modularity for quick caliber changes.
####
Q: How does the long action affect recoil compared to short-action models?
A: Recoil is primarily influenced by cartridge weight and powder burn, not action length. However, the long action’s reinforced components may absorb recoil slightly better, but the difference is negligible for most shooters. The real impact comes from stock design and shooter technique—not the action itself.
####
Q: Can I upgrade a Remington 700 long action to handle even larger calibers?
A: Not without modifications. The 700’s long action is designed for standard magnums (e.g., .300 Win Mag, .338 Lapua). Attempting to chamber experimental or oversized cartridges risks damaging the action. For extreme calibers like .50 BMG, specialized actions (e.g., the Remington 700 BDL) are required.
#### Q: Are aftermarket triggers compatible with Remington 700 long action models?
A: Yes, but with caveats. Remington’s stock triggers are designed to interface with the action’s sear, and aftermarket triggers must match the sear engagement profile. Brands like Timney and HRS offer triggers specifically engineered for the 700, ensuring compatibility without voiding warranties.
#### Q: What’s the best barrel profile for long-range shooting with a Remington 700 long action?
A: For long-range precision, a medium-heavy contour barrel (e.g., 1:10 or 1:12 twist) with a free-floating mount is ideal. Heavy barrels reduce harmonics but may slow bullet stability; lighter profiles improve maneuverability. The choice depends on the caliber and intended use—varmint shooters often prefer faster twists, while hunters may opt for heavier barrels for stability.
#### Q: How does the Remington 700 long action compare to the M1A for tactical use?
A: The 700 offers more caliber flexibility (e.g., .300 Win Mag vs. the M1A’s .308/.223), but the M1A’s A2-style stock and mil-spec features make it better suited for military-style engagements. For tactical shooters who need versatility, the 700 wins; for those adhering to strict military standards, the M1A is the choice.
#### Q: Are there any known reliability issues with Remington 700 long action calibers?
A: Field reports indicate that reliability hinges on maintenance. Dirty or fouled actions can cause feed issues, but this is true of all bolt-action rifles. The 700’s long action is no more prone to failure than its short-action counterpart—provided the shooter follows basic cleaning protocols. Some early models had minor magazine well issues, but Remington addressed these in later revisions.
